| Asunto: | [SALUD_AMBIENTAL] RV: [occ-env-med-l] Article on physicians receiving pressure to underreport | | Fecha: | Sabado, 28 de Junio, 2008 14:39:18 (-0300) | | Autor: | Sociedad de Ecologia Medica y Social <ecomed @...........org>
|
-----Mensaje original-----
De: bounce-22494964-6853841@listserv.unc.edu
[mailto:bounce-22494964-6853841@listserv.unc.edu] En nombre de Gary
Greenberg
Enviado el: Jueves, 26 de Junio de 2008 09:50 p.m.
Para: Societe of medical ecology
Asunto: [occ-env-med-l] Article on physicians receiving pressure to
underreport
Unclear why this failed to reach the forum without my help.
Please reply to all or to Dr. Buono
From: Gina Buono/LSF/AHC gina.buono@aurora.org
Date: 06/25/2008 11:30AM
Subject: Re: [occ-env-med-l] Article on physicians receiving pressure
to underreport
The opposite is also true, and I have come to believe, even more true
than I want to acknowledge. Illness and injuries which should not be
considered work related are. The evaluations done by treating MD's
and specialists are usually not detailed enough to establish causation
or work relatedness. I am sad to say, that as I review these cases I
find that there is very poor documentation of the exposures (either
ergonomic or toxicologic), poor documentation of physical findings,
and often a nebulous treatment plan.
Providers are pressured by workers into giving "paid vacations", or
prolonged restrictions costing employers millions of dollars.
Providers will make something " work related" because the
re-imbursement is so good.
Worker's are forced to use worker's compensation insurance to get
treatment when they lack sufficient personal insurance, or abuse the
system because it is so easy to abuse.
Employers are forced to try to hide injuries and illnesses because it
is used to "experience rate them" and drives up the cost of insurance
for them. The OSHA log was originally intended to be an
epidemiological tool for the DOL. It has turned into a stick that
insurance companies can use to bludgeon employers
The Worker's Compensation system constitutes a "Moral Hazard" to
Workers, Providers and to Employers. It needs reform. Doctors should
be accountable to whoever is paying the bill. Doctors who treat a
worker's comp injuries/illnesses must step outside their role as
patient advocate, and into the role of arbitrator between the worker
and the employer. With every worker comp injury, their are two
patients: the employer and the employee. Doctors and even more so,
Health Care systems, have to be accountable for their part in driving
up the cost of doing business. When employers can no longer bare the
cost of doing business in America, they take their business elsewhere.
That is not good for anyone.
My opinion (diatribe) only
G. Buono MD MPH
- Hide quoted text -
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Lee Hager <leehager@cablespeed.com> wrote:
>
> This link was forwarded to me by a colleague in the hearing conservation
> field - thought it may be of interest to you all. :
> http://www.charlotte.com/local/story/587539.html
>
> Lee Hager
> E-A-Rfit and customE-A-R
> 517.647.5882/cell 517.290.1907
> leehager@cablespeed.com
|