Inicio > Mis eListas > humboldt > Mensajes

 Índice de Mensajes 
 Mensajes 4361 al 4380 
AsuntoAutor
1675/04 - La histo Centro H
1676/04 - Presenta Centro H
1677/04 - Revista Centro H
1678/04 - Uma Crít Centro H
1679/04 - Retos pa Centro H
1680/04 - América Centro H
1681/04 - Desafío Centro H
1682/04 - Octubre Centro H
1683/04 - América Centro H
1684/04 - Tarea pa Centro H
1685/04 - Fw: EN L Centro H
1686/04 - REGION M Centro H
1687/04 - Presenta Centro H
1688/04- "La reneg Centro H
1689/04 - Pasado, Centro H
1690/04 - México: Centro H
1691/04 - La teorí Centro H
1692/04 - Doutorad Centro H
1693/04 - La muert Centro H
1694/04 - Iraq: De Centro H
 << 20 ant. | 20 sig. >>
 
Noticias del Cehu
Página principal    Mensajes | Enviar Mensaje | Ficheros | Datos | Encuestas | Eventos | Mis Preferencias

Mostrando mensaje 4595     < Anterior | Siguiente >
Responder a este mensaje
Asunto:NoticiasdelCeHu 1685/04 - Fw: EN LINEA: Globalization versus Regionalization (Centro Humboldt)
Fecha:Martes, 19 de Octubre, 2004  15:31:03 (-0300)
Autor:Centro Humboldt <humboldt @...............ar>

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: EN LINEA: Globalization versus Regionalization (Centro Humboldt)

Revista Virtual del Centro Humboldt
Posicion Internacional

GLOBALIZATION VERSUS REGIONALIZATION
OMAR H. GEJO and ANA M. LIBERALI
http://webs.uolsinectis.com.ar/humboldt/historia.html

Editorial
Globalization versus Regionalization
Estrategias Geopolíticas en América Latina
El Medio Natural y la Formación Profesional en Geografía.
Aportes para la Gestión Social del Territorio
Evidencias Geográficas de "Big Brother" en la Red!


Este texto existe tambien en Frances.
Si les interesan recibirle, avisarme por favor     Marie-Christine

Globalization vs. Regionalization
Something more than an apparent contradiction

Prof. Omar Horacio Gejo
Lic. Ana María Liberali
National University of Luján
Alexander von Humboldt Centro of Studies
ARGENTINA


Due to its imposing presence over the last few years and being the subject matter of almost every relevant discussion, not taking into account the level of formality of the former, the concept of globalisation has turned into a supreme idea in which its explanatory and descriptive capacity have achieved an absolute consensus including not only its supporters but also those who are against it.
However, beyond all discourse maelstrom brought about by this phenomenon, it is convenient to maintain a “healthy prudence”, that is a preservative scepticism so as to avoid being carried away by the fierce forces generated by context imposition, which tends to produce “ thought-killers”, vacuous consensus which leads to the so-called statu quo.

GLOBALIZATION: BACK TO GEOGRAPHY?

The main goal of this new concept has been that of highlighting substantial differences if we compare it with what we had previously experienced. To put it in a nutshell, globalisation would imply being in the presence of a different world, dissimilar in many aspects, of course. (1)
We are bound to find various opinions about the surge of this new term. Some people date back to the 60’s.
The majority, however, agree that it was the decade of 80 that triggered this situation, to become, later on, the onset of significant controversies leaving the 90’s marked by a vast phraseology that derives from the simple utterance of this allencompassing word which will end up compressing and squashing everything on its way. (2)
But the massive consent to its existence has been accompanied by an extreme difficulty in reaching an agreement on the several meanings that this word carries. That is to say, if there’s no disagreement on the acceptance of its reality, the question will be much less clear when dealing with its implications, laying bare its lack of consistency and paradoxical baseline of the previous extended agreement.
The sudden irruption of these issues have allowed Geography to regain certain importance in the Science field due to the resurgence of the spatial dimension as a necessary step for the analysis –or study- of societies development and evolution.
Over many decades we had witnessed a total domination of the sociological approaches to reality. The many analysis of social organisations came across as a phenomenal abstraction from which the conditions, in which social relations took place, were bound to be elided.(3)
This period, probably open during the 60’s, was beginning to close-at least formally- when in the 90’s the spatial or territorial issue was firmly re-installed, giving way to the inevitable need of geographical contextualization of the events.
From this point of view, globalisation has been the vehicle that Geography has found to make its approach necessary once more, in its attempt to understand the evolution of reality. (4)

.../... Sigue En Linea : http://webs.uolsinectis.com.ar/humboldt/historia.html




______________________

Marie-Christine LACOSTE, CNRS, Information Scientifique
Coordinadora de "RUMBOS"

Lista de Informacion Cientifica y Red de Investigadores
sobre y de America Latina - Ciencias Sociales y Humanas -
Idiomas de la Lista : Espanol, Frances, Ingles, Portugues

Direccion Postal : Maison de la Recherche, Université de Toulouse-le-Mirail
5, Allées Antonio Machado - 31058 Toulouse Cedex 9 (France)
Tél : (33) (0)5 61 50 43 08
e.mail : lacoste@univ-tlse2.fr