|
|
|
| Asunto: | Re: [dxcolombia] CW or not CW, that is the Q | | Fecha: | Jueves, 28 de Diciembre, 2006 14:50:17 (-0500) | | Autor: | HK3CW <cwdude @.....com>
|
|
Desde cuando este reflector cambio de idioma? Si es
DX Colombia se debe respetar al 99% de los suscriptores e intercambiar sus
impresiones en Español..para eso es un reflector donde todos pueden leer y
entender.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 12:53
PM
Subject: Re: [dxcolombia] CW or not CW,
that is the Q
Hi
David.
I'm agree with
you. CW is not an obstacle in the path to get a license, less here in
Colombia, where to get license doesn't require a practice exam, and the
CW part in the exam, is piece of cake.
What I do
really think, is, if you want to become a total radioamateur, you
must know almost all the ways and modes to make a transition, and how to use
them at least in emergency cases.
Learn CW is
not like learning a foreign language, I'm not an Expert CW Op, but I'm on the
way, and is so different.
--
73s
Good Dxing
SERGIO HENAO HENAO
hk4kdo@gmail.com
HK4KDO
POLITICA
ANTI SPAM:
Si usted va a retransmitir este mensaje, por favor borre la
dirección y nombre de quien se lo remitió inicialmente. De esta manera
mantendremos nuestros correos limpios de mensajes indeseables y de Spams.
Procure usar siempre CCO ( con copia oculta ) en todos sus mensajes.
Gracias
On 12/27/06, David J.
Sourdis <hk1kxa@hotmail.com>
wrote:
First I must say that I am a CW op most of the time.
Seeing that ham radio seems to have less people in its ranks everyday, it
could be wise to have less obstacles in the path to get a license.
On the other side, some say that this strategy could go against
the level of operating skills and qualities of those who reach the ham
bands. That is the argument No. 1 of many who support CW as a
filter for our hobby. I don´t agree completely with this. There are
other ways to ensure a minimum of quality and skills among the newcomers.
There are many who have passed the "filter" and have poor operating skills
and manners, way before this controversy was born.
In this moment, knowing the commercial interests that want to take our
frequency allocations, it could be better to have more people with us, even
if this means the sacrifice of quality. As I said above, I don't think that
CW or not CW is directly and totally related to ops "quality".
Is my opinion that the comparison or analogy between learning
CW and learning a foreign language is totally out of focus. Learning a
different stile of writing could be a better approach. CW is not a new
language, you use it with your language.
73 and happy new year for all.
David
hk1kxa/ea5
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN
Messenger Download today it's FREE!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tu dirección de suscripción a este boletín es hk4kdo@gmail.com
Para darte de baja, envía un mensaje a
dxcolombia-baja@eListas.net
Para obtener ayuda, visita http://www.eListas.net/lista/dxcolombia
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tu dirección de suscripción a este boletín es cwdude@gmail.com
Para darte de baja, envía un mensaje a
dxcolombia-baja@eListas.net
Para obtener ayuda, visita http://www.eListas.net/lista/dxcolombia
|
|
|
Re: CW or not CW, 
Responder a este mensaje